Estimated reading time: 0 minutes, 34 seconds

Courts Render Disparate Opinions on NSA Surveillance

News Roundup
Written by 

Deciding a lawsuit brought by the ACLU, a federal judge in New York last week ruled that the National Security Administration’s mass collection of telephone data is a necessary response to terrorism and does not violate the U.S. Constitution. So reports the Los Angeles Times.

The ruling contrasts sharply with a decision rendered by a Washington, D.C. federal judge earlier this month holding that the NSA’s telephone data collection violates the Fourth Amendment’s protection from unreasonable searches. Both cases will likely be appealed. Whichever side loses in the appeals courts likely will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to decide the issue.

Read the full article from the Los Angeles Times.

Read 4266 times
Rate this item
(0 votes)
More in this category: « New Rules Require Vending Machines to Post Calorie Info Prominent Law Partner Admits to Heinous Sex Crimes »

Latest from Progressive Law Practice

Visit other PMG Sites:
PMG360 is committed to protecting the privacy of the personal data we collect from our subscribers/agents/customers/exhibitors and sponsors. On May 25th, the European's GDPR policy will be enforced. Nothing is changing about your current settings or how your information is processed, however, we have made a few changes. We have updated our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy to make it easier for you to understand what information we collect, how and why we collect it.
Ok Decline