Estimated reading time: 0 minutes, 33 seconds

Inmate Appeals Conviction Based on Dubious ‘Forensic Dentistry’

A disputed bite-mark identification is at the heart of a Mississippi man’s appeal of his conviction for the murder and rape of an 84-year-old woman. So reports The New York Times.

 

The man, 61-year old Eddie Lee Howard Jr., was convicted largely because an expert’s testimony matched his teeth to the victim’s purported bite wounds, examined only after her body had been buried and exhumed. Despite mounting evidence that matching rape and murder victims’ bite marks with suspects’ dentition is unreliable, courts have been reluctant to reopen cases based on even the most dubious dental claims.

 

Read the fulla rticle from The New York Times.

Read 3664 times
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Visit other PMG Sites:

PMG360 is committed to protecting the privacy of the personal data we collect from our subscribers/agents/customers/exhibitors and sponsors. On May 25th, the European's GDPR policy will be enforced. Nothing is changing about your current settings or how your information is processed, however, we have made a few changes. We have updated our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy to make it easier for you to understand what information we collect, how and why we collect it.